While reading the article, I stopped at the statement “Lack of assessment” (203). This quote made me question why students will only value or pay attention to the material if it is being assessed. I wonder if other methods will promote student engagement with math history without having the added stressors of being graded. As a result, I become eager to read section 7.4 on “Ideas and examples for classroom implementation.” Upon reading this section, I was astonished at the various ways history could be presented. Particularly, I became inspired to introduce games, historical problems, and ancient methods of doing mathematics into a high school classroom. The introduction of unsolved and unsolvable problems may shock students who previously believed that math was an unalterable subject. They may also find relief in learning the existence of many methods to solve a problem. Lastly, I find that adolescents are eager to prove teachers wrong, and thus may be enticed by these problems.
After reading the article, I recognize that my initial methods for teaching math history were not seamlessly incorporated into my lessons. I previously believed that math history may only be presented as a separate unit, activity, or assignment. By exploring the different approaches to integration, I feel more confident in teaching math history in engaging ways and less constrained by the types of activities I can use.

Excellent reflection, Saiya! It’s great to see that before reading the article, you already had some great ideas about ways to incorporate history in your math classroom, and now feeling even more confident in doing so more integratively. Both approaches have their benefits. Hopefully, this course will provide more resources for you to enrich students’ math experiences through history!
ReplyDelete